Dollar Shave Club is using generative AI to make its advertising process faster, cheaper, and more tightly controlled by its own marketing team. The grooming brand’s latest campaign work shows a more specific use case for AI in creative production: not replacing brand strategy, but removing the production drag that often forces small teams to slow down or outsource.
The new work includes an AI-powered campaign for Ball Spray built around deliberately exaggerated humor, plus earlier AI-supported creative tied to the brand’s no BS positioning. Chief Brand and Innovation Officer Laura Higgins has framed the technology as a way to let creatives stay focused on ideas while automation handles the smaller production steps that can consume time and budget.
That distinction matters because AI advertising is often discussed as a question of replacement. Dollar Shave Club’s approach points to a more practical tension. The real shift is not whether AI can make an ad. It is whether a brand can use AI to recover the speed, confidence, and tonal sharpness that made its marketing recognizable in the first place.
Table of contents
Jump to each section:
- Why the campaign matters
- How AI is changing production boundaries
- The brand voice test
- What marketers should know about AI-made ads
Why the campaign matters
Dollar Shave Club has always depended on a particular kind of marketing energy: quick, irreverent, culturally legible, and built around a challenger posture. Its early brand equity came from making low-cost creative feel sharper than the category’s polished incumbents. Generative AI now gives that same positioning a new production logic.
The Ball Spray campaign uses an intentionally cartoonish premise that would be awkward, expensive, or impractical to film conventionally. AI makes the idea more executable because the visual world is supposed to feel exaggerated rather than literal. In this case, artificiality is not a flaw to hide. It is part of the joke.
That is the more interesting lesson. AI works best when the creative idea gives it a reason to look synthetic.
For marketers, this is a useful counterpoint to the fear of AI slop. The issue is not simply whether the asset was machine-assisted. The issue is whether the use of AI has a clear creative function, a clear brand reason, and a clear audience expectation. Dollar Shave Club’s campaign fits because the brand has permission to be absurd, direct, and visually over the top.
How AI is changing production boundaries
The campaign also says something about the agency relationship. Dollar Shave Club has worked with outside creative partners on AI-led ads, but the brand’s newer work shows more of the process moving inside. Higgins briefed the concept internally, the team used tools such as Claude and Higgsfield, and the work moved from concepting to finished creative at a pace that traditional production would struggle to match.
This does not make agencies irrelevant. It changes the work agencies are asked to justify.
The common assumption is that AI primarily threatens creative craft. The contrasting reality is that it first pressures production dependency. Brands that already know their voice can use AI to reduce the amount of outside support needed for iteration, resizing, concept exploration, and visually unusual executions. The strategic implication is that agencies may become more valuable for higher-order judgment, campaign systems, and creative direction, while routine production becomes harder to defend as a premium service.
Dollar Shave Club is a useful example because the brand is not treating AI as a creative department by itself. Human judgment still decides what is funny, what feels on-brand, and what should not be synthetic. The military-themed campaign Higgins discussed separately relies on real people and real footage because authenticity is the message. The Ball Spray campaign can be artificial because the premise is built for exaggeration.
AI does not remove the need for taste. It makes taste more visible.
The brand voice test
The deeper shift is that generative AI is becoming a test of brand clarity. Teams with a distinct voice can use AI to scale expression because they know what good output should feel like. Teams with vague positioning are more likely to produce generic assets, because the tool has no strong creative boundary to work within.
Dollar Shave Club’s advantage is not just that it adopted AI. It has a recognizable brand attitude to feed into the process. Its newer work leans back into competitive sparring, direct product humor, and anti-corporate simplicity. That matters in a grooming category where many products can look interchangeable and where challenger brands need a reason to be remembered.
The brand’s use of AI also reflects a practical segmentation of creative risk. It can use synthetic visuals when the joke is already unreal, but avoid them when the subject requires sincerity. That judgment is more useful than a fixed rule about how much AI is acceptable in advertising.
For many marketing teams, the temptation will be to ask whether AI can make more assets. The better question is whether the team has a clear enough brand system to reject the wrong ones.
What marketers should know about AI-made ads
Dollar Shave Club’s campaign does not prove that every brand should move creative production in-house. It does show how AI changes the operating model for brands with a strong voice, fast approval paths, and tolerance for experimentation.
Speed is strategic only when direction is clear. Faster production helps when the brief is sharp and the brand knows what it is trying to say. Without that clarity, AI simply accelerates indecision.
Synthetic creative needs a reason to exist. The strongest AI-made ads do not pretend to be conventional production. They use artificiality to support the premise, the humor, the product truth, or the format.
In-house teams gain leverage, not automatic superiority. Dollar Shave Club can move faster because its team owns the voice and can make decisions quickly. A slower organization with more approval layers may not see the same benefit from the same tools.
Disclosure and audience trust remain part of the creative brief. AI-made work is easier to accept when the brand is not trying to disguise what viewers are seeing. The more synthetic the asset, the more important it becomes to make the intent feel honest.
The broader implication is that AI is pushing marketers to separate production from positioning. Production is becoming cheaper, faster, and more flexible. Positioning is not. A brand still needs a point of view, a sense of what it can credibly say, and the discipline to know when automation should stop.
That is why Dollar Shave Club’s move is more than a novelty campaign. It suggests that the brands most likely to benefit from AI creative tools are not necessarily the largest or most technically advanced. They are the ones with the clearest editorial spine.
As AI becomes easier to access, creative advantage may come less from who can generate assets and more from who can recognize which assets still sound like the brand.
Leave a Reply